She’s Back!

It has been a very busy few months working on the first ever Lethbridge Word On The Street Festival, and what an amazing adventure it has been! I am just finalizing my evaluation reports and then looking forward to getting back into the groove on some of my other projects, including several new blog posts here focused on some recent marketing lessons.

In the meantime, please enjoy seeing the great community and sponsor engagement the festival enjoyed featured on the Lethbridge Word On The Street Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/LethbridgeWOTS

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Big Picture

Thank you to gratitude guru Wes Hopper for sharing this insight:

“It will make an immense difference with your faith and spirit whether you look upon civilization as a good thing which is becoming better or as a bad and evil thing which is decaying. ” -    Wallace Wattles

The attitude and beliefs we bring to life have a very big effect on what we experience in life, because we tend to find what we’re looking for.

The fact of history is that in all times and civilizations there have been great injustices, as well as the seeds of great advances. The injustices get all the attention, because the great advances tend to take place quietly and over time.

 But as Wattles says, it makes a big difference which side of things we choose to see. Not to history, but to us!

History will go on and do what history does, but our lives will rise and fall with the choices that we make. If we see the world as falling apart we become pessimistic, depressed, and unproductive.  But how big of an impact on the world can we have when we’re acting like  that?

So we should take Wattles’ advice.  See the world as becoming better every day and resolve to be part of that process.

Be confident, optimistic and enthusiastic about life. We may adjust our strategies in line with the daily news but we never give up on our dreams. If civilization is to become better, it’s up to us to make it happen, one faithful choice at a time.

If it is to be, it’s up to me … and you.

How can you use this thought to frame the tasks you might work on today?

Colette

Leave a Comment

Filed under adult learning, business, Clarity, Life's Lessons, Motivation, philosophy, sales motivation, setting goals

Now The Shoe’s On The Other Foot

From my friend and hero Kristine Cassie, fearless advocate and CEO of the Lethbridge YWCA:

YWCA Walk A Mile In Her ShoesWho wouldn’t want to have their brother, friend, colleague, husband, partner, neighbour, cousin, boss, uncle, grandpa or business rival to walk in some stunning heels! And all for a great cause – support YWCA’s in Alberta in our work to end violence by being part of a fabulously fun event. Hosted by all four YWCA’s, this is YWCA Lethbridge’s first Walk a Mile event hosted September 23rd, 2011.

By making one call to the YWCA at 403-329-0088 or by emailing Diana Sim at dsim@ywcalethbridge.org you can register an individual or a team, get pledges, then come out and walk the line in a pair of shoes that any diva would be envious of

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Advocacy, Alberta, Boards, collaborate, community, EWI, non profit, volunteer recruitment

Seeing The Big Picture Even In Crisis

This piece from Delancey Place is an important reminder in the face of the near-panic we are seeing from American leaders:

“In today’s excerpt – in a banking crisis, such as the one the U.S. faced in 2007/2008 and whose troubling after-effects remain, there are two critical items to manage. The first is that if a major financial institution fails, its operations continue so that counter-parties are not damaged and confidence in markets is not destroyed. The second is that if major financial institutions are saddled with huge numbers of bad loans, regulatory solutions be applied that allow these banks to continue to make new good loans. In the Latin American debt crisis of 1982, this second item was managed so well that few even remember the crisis. Similarly, in the Continental Illinois (Penn Square) crisis of 1984, the first item was so well-managed that markets were minimally disrupted. In the current crisis, neither item has been well-managed, leading to both the era-defining disruption of the Lehman failure and the continued hobbled operations of some of our largest financial institutions:

“Indefensible policy mistakes by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson in his handling of Lehman Brothers and AIG severely damaged the credibility that eventually forced the Bush administration to recapitalize the U.S. banking system. …

“[This contrasts sharply to Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker's handling of the Continental Illinois crisis.] When Continental Illinois Bank collapsed in 1984, … Volcker immediately asked J.P. Morgan to arrange a ‘convoy’ of banks around the institution [to provide liquidity and] prevent money from fleeing. Less than 48 hours later, the bank was nationalized. Although Continental Illinois was one of the nation’s leading money center banks, proper handling of the nationalization process by the regulators prevented major problems.

“Inexplicably, however, Mr. Paulson decided to let Lehman Brothers fail, indicating from the start that he had no intention of using public funds to rescue the institution. Although Lehman Brothers was not a commercial bank, and the Fed and the Treasury were not obliged to save it, Paulson’s stubbornness was in a sharp contrast to the Fed and the Treasury’s efforts to minimize disruptions from the collapse of Bear Stearns, another securities firm. … Lehman was a global financial institution, and thousands of investors and institutions around the world were left high and dry. The resulting anger went a long way toward destroying the credibility of U.S. banks, U.S. Bank regulators, and the U.S. government. And the rest is history. …

“In [past crises] in the US, authorities successfully maintained lending functions of the banks when they were saddled with huge amounts of NPLs [non-performing loans or bad loans], for example, during the Latin American debt crisis, which erupted in 1982. In this crisis the U.S. had to move slowly because the vast majority of U.S. money center banks were technically insolvent and shutting down the entire banking system was not an option. With so many international banks also involved, the Fed had to be very careful in managing the crisis to ensure the continued functioning of the banking system and prevent negative fallout for the economy.

“[Federal Reserve Chairman] Paul Volcker … handled the situation masterfully. Although the process eventually took a dozen years, it was done without a credit crunch and at no cost to taxpayers ­in contrast to the $160 billion bill for the cleanup of the S&L crisis, which was only a tenth the size of the Latin American debt crisis. Ironically, the Fed’s response was so elegant that few people are even aware of it. Many may have heard of the crisis, but the authorities’ deft handling of the situation received little public attention because no taxpayer money was required or requested. Further, no one involved could talk about it while events were still unfolding – certainly no one from the New York Fed or the technically insolvent money center banks. Nor was anyone interested in hearing about it once the cleanup was over. As a result, some of the key lessons learned from this episode are missing from the current debate on how to handle the banking crisis.”

Author: Richard C. Koo
Title: The Holy Grail of Macroeconomics
Publisher: Wiley
Date: Copyright 2009 by John Wiley & Sons (Asia)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Awards, Best Practices, business, Clarity, communication, economics, foreign policy, government, Political Action

“If It Is To Be…”

I know we all have times where we are simply overloaded with the demands of work, family and community, but there was something in this piece from SparkPeople that hit home for me.  It’s been hot and I know there have been days when I just run out of steam but still I think I can do better and these few  words were a great reminder.

sloth; cute but lazy
“Who? Me?”

“We commonly procrastinate or put off an activity altogether by saying “It will get done eventually” or “Someone else will do it.” Wrong! Being lazy and not taking responsibility are wastes of time. Often the power for change is within us, but without our efforts things would fail or go awry. You cannot rely on help from others, only what your own two hands accomplish on their own. Hard work is a habit that needs constant attention. But be mindful that you are giving your full effort to a project. Apply yourself, value your time, and don’t squander it hoping for help. Remember the old saying… “If it is to be, it’s up to me.”

Hope you’re having a great summer weekend wherever you are.

Colette

Leave a Comment

Filed under adult learning, Best Practices, business, Clarity, Life's Lessons, Motivation, sales motivation

Tell Your Story Well

Here’s a great, easy to understand piece on storytelling for business by writer Matthew E. May , Founder, Shibumi Creative Works

April 21, 2011

Judging by the number of books published in the last six months on the topic of storytelling in business, it’s clear there’s a hunger for how to tell a clear and resonant story that moves others to not only embrace new ideas, but act on them. I’ve read and reviewed a number of those books, and while it’s not true in every case, most are written by people who aren’t necessarily renowned storytellers, but rather have studied them and decoded their magic from afar.

I decided to see if I could find something direct from a world class storyteller, something that might provide a user-friendly framework for thinking about how to craft a compelling story, and something that might not need an entire book to explain. In other words, I wanted a simple storytelling crib sheet.

I found it. And from a most unlikely source: Kurt Vonnegut. Yes, the Kurt Vonnegut, of the masterpiece Slaughterhouse-Five (and many others) fame.

Most people don’t know that Vonnegut actually began his professional writing career at General Electric, writing press releases in their public relations department during the late 1940s. The late forties and early fifties were the heyday of short stories, as the country was still largely television-free. After a few of his stories were published in Collier’s, Vonnegut quit G.E., moved to Cape Cod, and devoted himself to writing.

In the introduction of his book Bagombo Snuff Box, a collection of twenty-three short fiction stories, Vonnegut sets out eight rules under the heading of “Creative Writing 101″:

  1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
  2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for. In other words, have a hero.
  3. Every character should want something, even if it is a glass of water.
  4. Every sentence must do one of two things: reveal character or advance the action.
  5. Start as close to the end as possible.
  6. Be a sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them—in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
  7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window…to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
  8. Give your readers such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.

Storytelling in business often takes a form other than written, such as a presentation or a speech. But with a few simple word changes (“audience” instead of “reader,” or “hero” instead of “character,” or “speak” instead of “write,”) it should be easy enough to apply these rules to any storytelling attempt.

These rules are easy enough to understand. We all need someone or something—a hero—to root for, but we want the storyteller to keep it real, so we can connect with the story, invest ourselves in it. If we can’t see parts of ourselves reflected in the hero’s journey, and as a result care about what happens in the end, the story will fall flat. It’s tough to relate to perfect or flawless heroes—heroes that too easily succeed aren’t real, aren’’t likable, and don’’t resonate.

And with ever-shrinking attention spans, a good storyteller must make every written or spoken line count to keep things moving, or we’ll lose interest. The best way to follow Vonnegut’s suggestion is to simply put every line you write or speak on trial for it’s life: “is this a nice-to-have or need-to-have?” When in doubt, cut it out.

There have been a number scientific studies recently confirming that we are hardwired to learn through stories. If you’re like me, and you’re fascinated by the workings of the mind and the neuroscience of stories, check out the September 2008 issue of Scientific American Mind, which has a feature article called “The Secrets of Storytelling: Why We Love a Good Yarn.”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Best Practices, business, Clarity, communication, Developing content, newsletter, Public Speaking, Storytelling, writing

I Love Mondays

And I love Wizard of Ads guru Roy H. Williams for his brilliant insights on marketing and human behavior. From Roy, here is this week’s Monday Morning Memo:

Wizard of Ads creator Roy H. Williams

Wizard of Ads creator Roy H. Williamsere's this weeks Monday Morning Memo:

Relevance, Real-evance, Relate-evence

Relevance has always been an important part of effective communication but never so much as today.

The appalling dropout rate in High Schools and the sharp decline in church attendance are just two of the indicators of an accelerated demand by people for relevance.

“Why should I? Will it make me happier? Is it really going to make a difference or is it just a waste of my time?” These are the unspoken questions asked all day, every day, by every customer. I believe these fierce, unspoken questions are society’s response to the jet-engine whine of information overload.

Are you answering these unspoken questions in your ads, or are you just adding to the overload?

“I am the customer. How will you change my condition? Convince me that interacting with you would be worth my time.”

Keep in mind, advertiser, that your ad will be just one of 5,000 sneaky little messages that will try to break into the customer’s consciousness today. Most of these 5,000 messages will be evaluated and dismissed in a fraction of a second. Will yours be one of these? Look around. The air is thick with messages. They bark like little dogs and wave at us like shadows from the corners of our eyes.

Let’s talk for a moment about the two basic styles of selling:

A dynamic “Me” personality believes in “overcoming objections.” Selling is combat. Push.

A responsive “We” personality believes in “positive attraction.” Selling is seduction. Pull.

Most people talk about Push and Pull as different forms of media. “The Internet,” they say, “is a Pull media. Everything else is Push.”

But don’t you believe that for a second. “Push” and “Pull” don’t describe the media; they describe the relationship between advertiser and customer. Internet advertisers who use a Push message strategy quickly conclude they’re somehow “reaching the wrong people” and then go off to find a qualified opt-in list because, “By golly, if I can just reach the right people I know I can make me some money!”  It’s hard to convince an overbearing Push jackass that he needs to change his approach.

Let me say this plainly: Marshall McLuhan was wrong. The media is NOT the message. The message is the message.

What, I ask you, will be your message? The media is just the messenger who will deliver it. Do you actually believe it is the messenger who determines the customer’s response to your message?

Push or Pull can be used online.
Push or Pull can be used in traditional media.

Advertisers using a Pull strategy in traditional media are seeing this new style of advertising work extremely well.

Pull
is built on relevance, positive attraction, connection, relationship and credibility. But you can’t create an ad that relates to your customer and seems credible to them until you first understand the wants, needs, hungers, fears and anxieties of your customer.

It’s not about you. It’s about them. How will your product or service change their condition? Tell them.

Leave a Comment

Filed under advertising, Best Practices, business, Clarity, communication, Customer Service, marketing, philosophy